Skip to main content
843-892-5671 Book Online

Do I Need Surgery for a Herniated Disc, or Can I Try Spinal Decompression First?

Elite Family Chiropractic Blog Do I Need Surgery for a Herniated Disc, or Can I Try Spinal Decompression First?
Do I Need Surgery for a Herniated Disc, or Can I Try Spinal Decompression First - Elite Family Chiropractic

Do I Need Surgery for a Herniated Disc, or Can I Try Spinal Decompression First?

 

When your leg is burning with sciatica, your back locks up getting out of bed, or numbness starts creeping into your foot, the question gets real fast:

Do I need surgery for a herniated disc, or can I try spinal decompression first?

Most patients are not asking out of curiosity. They are asking because pain is interrupting work, sleep, workouts, driving, and everyday life—and they want to know what gives them the best chance of getting back to normal.

The answer starts with something more important than choosing a treatment:

What is actually happening to the disc, and what structures is it affecting?

Before deciding between conservative care and surgery, a proper examination is needed. In many disc cases, advanced imaging such as an MRI is also important because it allows us to better understand the nature of the disc injury, whether a nerve is being compressed, how much space that nerve has, and whether other structures around the spine are involved.

Once we understand the diagnosis, we can begin deciding which level of care makes the most sense.

 

Spinal decompression vs surgery: they are not the same type of decompression

The terminology can be confusing because surgeons and chiropractors may both use the word "decompression", but they are talking about very different things.

When a spine surgeon performs a decompression surgery, the goal is generally to physically remove or modify tissue that is compressing a nerve or the spinal cord. For example, a surgeon may remove part of a herniated disc that is pressing against a nerve root. In other situations, bone or other structures may need to be removed to create more room around a nerve.

Surgery may also be used to stabilize the spine. When a spinal segment is significantly unstable, procedures such as spinal fusion can connect two or more vertebrae to prevent excessive movement. Non-surgical spinal decompression therapy works very differently.

Rather than surgically removing tissue, spinal decompression therapy uses controlled mechanical forces to influence how the spinal segment and disc are being loaded. The goal is to reduce mechanical stress on irritated structures, improve movement, and create a better environment for the disc and surrounding tissues to recover and function.

So although both treatments use the word decompression, one involves surgically creating space around neurological structures while the other attempts to influence the mechanics and loading of the spine without surgery.

 

The decision starts with the diagnosis

A “herniated disc” does not tell us everything we need to know. Disc bulges and disc herniations are different findings, and even two patients with similar MRI findings may require completely different treatment plans.

One patient may have pain and numbness but normal strength, stable neurological findings, and a disc that appears appropriate for conservative management. Another patient may have a large extrusion producing significant nerve compression and rapidly worsening weakness. Those patients should not be treated the same way.

A proper evaluation may include:

The MRI is extremely helpful, but the MRI should not make the decision by itself. The examination and the imaging have to make sense together.

 

When conservative treatment may be the right place to start

When there are no major neurological warning signs, many disc injuries can reasonably begin with conservative treatment. That might include a combination of chiropractic management, spinal decompression therapy, rehabilitation, activity modification, exercise, laser therapy, or other strategies depending on the individual patient. The goal is not simply to make the patient temporarily feel better.

We want to see measurable changes such as:

For appropriately selected patients, we would generally expect to see meaningful signs of improvement during the first several weeks of well-managed conservative treatment.

A 4–6 week period is often a useful clinical checkpoint. If someone is clearly improving, that gives us useful information and may support continuing conservative management. If they are not improving, are repeatedly losing the progress they make, or their neurological findings are changing, the plan needs to be reconsidered.

 

Conservative treatment and pain management do not have to compete

One of the biggest misconceptions in spine care is that patients have to choose one provider or one treatment philosophy. They often do not. There are situations where co-management between conservative spine care and pain management can be extremely valuable.

For example, a patient may have a herniated disc irritating a nerve root badly enough that pain is limiting sleep, walking, rehabilitation, and even basic movement. An epidural steroid injection or selective nerve-root injection may help decrease inflammation around that irritated nerve.

That can create an opportunity for the patient to move better and participate more effectively in conservative treatment. The injection has one job. The rehabilitation or conservative management has another. Used appropriately, they can complement one another.

 

What if I improve, but the relief does not last?

This is another important part of the decision. A patient may begin conservative care and respond well initially. Their leg pain decreases, movement improves, and they begin returning to normal activities. But then the improvement stalls. Or the pain continually returns.

At that point, simply repeating the same treatment indefinitely may not be the right answer. If meaningful improvement is not being sustained after an appropriate conservative trial, additional options should be considered.

That may include pain management, injections, additional imaging, electrodiagnostic testing in selected cases, or consultation with a spine surgeon. The goal is not to prove that conservative care works for everybody.

The goal is to determine what this patient needs next.

 

When surgery becomes the better option

There are situations where surgical evaluation should happen quickly. Progressive muscle weakness, bowel or bladder dysfunction, saddle anesthesia, significant loss of neurological function, or serious compression of the spinal cord or nerve structures can change the urgency of the case.

These are not situations where someone should simply continue trying treatments and hope the problem improves. Surgery may also become appropriate when there is no emergency but a patient has gone through a reasonable course of well-managed conservative care and continues to have severe pain, neurological symptoms, or major functional limitations.

If someone still cannot work, sleep, walk normally, regain strength, or participate in normal activities despite appropriate treatment, surgical consultation may become a very reasonable next step.

 

What exactly does a spine surgeon do for a herniated disc?

In many disc cases, the surgical goal is fairly straightforward: Decompress the neurological structure that is being compromised.

If disc material is compressing a spinal nerve, a surgeon may perform a discectomy or microdiscectomy to remove the portion of the disc producing the compression. If narrowing from bone, arthritis, or other structures is contributing to the problem, additional decompression may be necessary.

In other cases, the bigger issue is not simply compression. It is instability. When a spinal segment cannot safely maintain its normal mechanical relationship, stabilization procedures such as fusion may be considered.

That is an important distinction.

Surgeons generally operate to accomplish one or both of two major goals:

Decompress neurological structures or stabilize unstable spinal structures.

That is very different from the purpose of non-surgical decompression therapy.

 

What is spinal decompression therapy trying to accomplish?

Non-surgical spinal decompression is not attempting to surgically remove the herniated portion of the disc. Instead, we are trying to influence the mechanical environment surrounding the injured spinal segment.

Think about a disc as a structure that is repeatedly loaded throughout the day.

Sitting loads it.

Bending loads it.

Lifting loads it.

Gravity loads it.

Poor mechanics can repeatedly load it.

If a disc and nerve are already irritated, those forces can sometimes continue aggravating the problem.

Spinal decompression therapy uses controlled mechanical loading and unloading with the goal of reducing stress on the involved segment and improving how it functions.

In the right patient, that may help decrease irritation, improve movement, and allow the body more opportunity to recover. But it is not appropriate for every disc problem. That is why diagnosis has to come before the treatment.

 

The biggest advantage of spinal decompression therapy 

The appeal of spinal decompression therapy is straightforward: it is non-surgical.

There is no incision, no anesthesia, and no hospital recovery. For appropriately selected patients, it provides an opportunity to attempt conservative management before moving toward a more invasive option.

That can be especially valuable for active adults, working professionals, and parents who want to remain functional while treating the underlying problem.

Conservative care also gives us something else that is extremely important:

Clinical information over time.

We can see how the nerve responds. We can see whether strength improves. We can see what movements aggravate the patient. We can see whether symptoms centralize or move farther into an arm or leg. And we can see whether the patient is actually progressing.

That information can become extremely valuable if pain management or surgical consultation eventually becomes necessary.

 

The biggest advantage of surgery

Surgery can directly address a structural problem that conservative treatment cannot.

If disc material is significantly compressing a nerve root, surgery can physically remove that compression.

If neurological function is deteriorating, that ability becomes extremely important. For the right patient, surgery can dramatically improve leg pain, arm pain, walking tolerance, strength, or overall quality of life.

Surgery should not automatically be feared. It should also not automatically be the first answer simply because an MRI shows a herniated disc.

The question is whether the procedure matches the patient's actual clinical problem.

 

The most important question isn't decompression or surgery

Patients frequently come into our office believing they have to choose between two treatments. But that is usually not the first decision we need to make.

The better question is:

What does my disc problem actually require?

Some patients need conservative treatment. Some benefit from conservative treatment combined with pain management. Some need a surgical opinion. And a smaller group may need surgical intervention relatively quickly because neurological structures are at risk.

At Elite Family Chiropractic, our goal is not to convince every patient that spinal decompression is better than surgery. It is to understand the mechanics of the spine, correlate the examination with the imaging, monitor neurological function, and help determine the most appropriate level of care.

Sometimes that means treating the patient conservatively. Sometimes that means working alongside pain management. And sometimes the most important thing we can do is recognize that the patient needs a spine surgeon.

We have established relationships with spine surgeons and other specialists, which allows us to help patients move efficiently to the next level of care when it is needed. The goal is to build a plan around the individual patient and their clinical needs—not simply follow a one-size-fits-all treatment pathway or allow insurance limitations to dictate what care should be considered.

The goal of a chiropractor for herniated disc care should not be to sell you a treatment. It should be to help you understand what your spine actually needs and guide you toward the right level of care.

Author
Elite Family Chiropractic - Chiropractor Charleston, SC Brad Gorski DC, FSBT At Elite Family Chiropractic in Charleston, South Carolina, Dr. Brad Gorski is a top-ranked chiropractor offering effective treatment options for back pain, knee pain, neck and shoulder pain, sciatica, migraines, pinched nerves, herniated discs, and more. Dr. Gorski received his Doctor of Chiropractic degree from Palmer College of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa in 2008. He has completed extensive post-graduate training, becoming qualified in Hospital Based Spine Care, MRI Interpretation Review, and Trauma while also completing a Fellowship in Spinal Biomechanics and Trauma. He provides chiropractic care and helps his patients achieve their goal of optimum health and wellness.

You Might Also Enjoy...